Thursday, February 12, 2009
Display problem ? Click HERE
Conducting overpressure scenario analysis, derivation of relief load, follow by pressure safety valve (PSV) sizing and finally selection of PSV are common activities in oil and gas project. Nowadays, API Std 521 is commonly used for sizing and hence the required API effective discharge area is the result of the calculation. PSV with effective discharge area larger than required API effective discharge area shall be selected. However, many PSVs' certified area are presented in ASME area.How to relate API effective discharge area and ASME area ?
This is a very common question and problem face by many young engineers. Sometime engineers may wonder why a PSV with ASME "D orifice" is sufficient for a relief scenario required API "E orifice". Reason for the difference between API and ASME is dated back to 1962 when ASME Section VIII Code was changed to derate all certified relieving capacities by 10%. PSV manufacturers have decided to increase PSV flow area by 10%, instead of derating their capacity by 10%. Nevertheless the API "orifice" still remain unchanged.
A PSV with ASME flow area (AASME), ASME discharge coefficient (KASME) and API discharge coefficient (KAPI),
Corrected API effective discharge area, AAPI = KASME x AASME / KAPI
Example,
A calculated effective area based on KAPI = 0.973, AAPI = 0.12 inch2. A API "D orifice" with 0.11 inch2 is insufficient. A "E orifice" with 0.196 inch2 is required.
Let check the National Board published data, a ASME "D orifice" will have KASME = 0.859 and flow area of AASME = 0.15 inch2, the equivalent API effective discharge area would be
AAPI = KASME x AASME / KAPI
AAPI = 0.859 x 0.15 / 0.973
AAPI = 0.132 inch2
AAPI = 0.132 inch2
Labels: Overpressure Protection, Pressure Relief Device
posted by Webworm, 11:48 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Let us know your opinion !!! You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Home:
<< Home