Sunday, May 16, 2010
Oxygen corrosion in water injection pipeline is controlled by diffusion rate of Oxygen into Cathodic with following reaction :
Steel is corroded on the Anodic side with following reaction :
Water Injection Velocity Limit
Chlorine Free
water injection velocity limit (Vmax)of Carbon steel pipeline is :
With Chlorine concentration of 0.5 ppm
water injection velocity limit (Vmax)of Carbon steel pipeline is :
CA = Corrosion Allowance (mm)
Y = Life span (years)
CO2 = Oxegen concentration (ppb)
T = Seawater temperature (degC)
ρw = Seawater density (kg/m3)
Above figures was based on
Corrosion Allowance, CA = 3.0mm
Life span (years), Y = 20 years
Seawater temperature, T = 25 degC
Seawater density, ρw = 1030 kg/m3
At 20 ppb of Oxygen concentration, the velocity limit is 5.7 m/s (Chlorine free) and 2.6 m/s (Chlorine = 0.5 ppm).
At 10 ppb of Oxygen concentration, the velocity limit is 12.2 m/s (Chlorine free) and 5.6 m/s (Chlorine = 0.5 ppm).
Ref :
1) J.W. Oldfiedl, G.L. Swales, B.Todd, “ Corrosion of Metals in Deaerated Seawater”, Proc. Of the 2nd Corrosion Conference, held Jan, 1981
2) J.M. Drugli, T. Rogne, “ Effect of Oxygen and Chlorine Content on the Corrosion Rate of Carbon Steel Welds in Injection Water” CORROSION/93 paper no 65
3) Mamdouh M. Salama, “Erosion Velocity Limits for Water Injection Systems”, 1993
Related Topics
- Seawater Treatment & Injection For Well Maintenance & Increase Productivity
- Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking & Use correct MOC for seawater service
- How a Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking Lookslike ?
- Crevice Corrosion Engineering Guide Software for Stainless Steels
- Different Equation for Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN)
- Guideline on Use of MR0175 / ISO15156
Labels: Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking, Oil and Gas
Sunday, May 9, 2010
- Filtration - remove particles
- Deaeration - remove oxygen
- Chemical injection - prevent foaming, corrosion, alga / bacteria growth
- Vacuum deaeration
- Gas stripping
Present of large quantity of small particle may results particle passing filtration, accumulates, agglomerate and finally results plugging of formation. Coagulant may be required to be injected upstream of filtration package to promote particle coagulation and filtration.
Anti-Foam
Seawater may be contaminated with hydrocarbon when it is lifted. Seawater used for processing cooling, any leakage in the seawater heat exchanger also result Hydrocarbon present in the seawater. Presented of hydrocarbon in seawater may results foaming in deaeration column. Therefore, anti-foam may be required to suppress foaming.
Biocide (Hypo-chloride)
Corrosion Inhibitor
Related Topics
- Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking & Use correct MOC for seawater service
- How a Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking Lookslike ?
- Crevice Corrosion Engineering Guide Software for Stainless Steels
- Different Equation for Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN)
- Guideline on Use of MR0175 / ISO15156
Labels: Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking, Oil and Gas
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Download
- NACE MR0103 versus MR0175
- Common FAQs Related to NACE Standard MR0175 / ISO 15156
- Material Selection... USER Responsibility
- Error in NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156
- Guideline on Use of MR0175 / ISO15156
- What are the concerns related to H2S ?
- Safety Moment with H2S
- Pyrophoric Fire
- Pitting Corrosion - Mechanism & Prevention
Labels: Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking, Corrosion, Corrosion Resistance Material, Material
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Click here to download the article
A presentation has been prepared by the author which further summary the differences. You may download via the following link : Download Presentation Handout
Thanks to Don BUSH, Jeff BROWN & Keith LEWIS
- Common FAQs Related to NACE Standard MR0175 / ISO 15156
- Material Selection... USER Responsibility
- Error in NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156
- Guideline on Use of MR0175 / ISO15156
- What are the concerns related to H2S ?
- Safety Moment with H2S
- Pyrophoric Fire
- Pitting Corrosion - Mechanism & Prevention
Labels: Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking, Corrosion, Corrosion Resistance Material, Material
Friday, January 23, 2009
There are different grade of Stainless Steel i.e. SS304, SS316, S31803, S32205, etc. How Chloride [Cl] concentration, Sulfate [SO4] concentration, pH level, temperature, oxygen level, etc affecting crevice corrosion for different Stainless Steel ?
The Crevice Corrosion Engineering Guide for Stainless Steels (CCEG) is a program available FREE to check type of Stainless Steel susceptible to crevice corrosion in water under particular conditions and impurities. The CCEG is a program with predictive mathematical model of crevice corrosion to assist with the selection of stainless steels for use in chloride and sulphate containing waters, including sea water. It was jointly developed by Nickel Development Institute (NiDI) and Sheffield Testing Laboratories Ltd.
Application Range
This program has been developed with the following application range :
- Fluid : Water
- Operating temperature : 5 - 85 degC
- Chloride [Cl] concentration : 1-30,000 ppm
- Sulphate [SO4] concentration : 0-10,000 ppm
- Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) concentration : 0 - 65000 ppm or mg/L
- * Can be calculated base on 1.65 [Cl] + [SO4]
- Alkalinity : 0 - 10000 mg/L (as concentration of CaCO3 in mg/L)
- Hardness : 0 - 20000 mg/L (as concentration of CaCO3 in mg/L)
- pH : 5 - 9
The program will check for following material :
- S30400
- S31600
- S31700
- S31803
- S32205
- N08904
- 6% Mo SS
Example
Let take a water with following parameters :
- Chloride (ppm) : 1000
- Sulphate (ppm) : 100
- Hardness (as CaCO3 mg/L) : 100
- Alkalinity (As CaCO3 mg/L) : 100
- TDS (mg/L) : 1798
- pH : 7
- Temp (C) : 25
- Oxygen level (ppm) : 7
Download : Click here to download the program (1.17 MB).
Source : Nickel Development Institute (NiDI)
Related Topics
Labels: Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking, Corrosion, Corrosion Resistance Material
Saturday, January 17, 2009
- Subscribe FREE - Energy Biz
- Tips on Succession in FREE Subscription
Crevice is location /area / space where normal fluid has less contact and access with it. Typical example of crevice are gaps between parts, space between gaskets and bolt, inside seals, inside cracks due to external impact or scratches, spaces filled with deposits, plastic paper lay on the metal plate, etc. In crevice, the environment is different than area expose to normal fluid. For example, gasket with bolt. Bolt surface expose to atmosphere is oxygen rich while wet air trapped between bolt and gasket is stagnant and with limited oxygen. Localized corrosion occur in the crevice is called crevice corrosion.Crevice Corrosion Example
Following is an example of crevice corrosion at pipe support.
Crevice corrosion is pretty similar to pitting corrosion as discussed in "Pitting Corrosion - Mechanism & Prevention".
Mechanism
A metal surface with gasket at shown above will potentially experience crevice corrosion. Oxygen rich fluid enters crevice between gasket and metal surface.
- Genenal Oxidation Corroion
Normal corrosion (general oxidation corrosion) will occur through the metal surface outside and inside the crevice. As oxygen in trapped fluid consumed oxygen, environment within crevice is deoxygenated (low in oxygen level) increases the potential difference between crevice environment and oxygen rich environment.
Metal (E.g. FE) surface (expose to atmosphere) is oxygen rich will becomes the cathode whilst the metal surface in the crevice (gasket contacted area) is low in oxygen level will becomes anode. This form a complete circuit where metal at the crevice (FE) will be ionized to release electron (e) and form ion Ferum (FE2+), this electron will travel to the metal surface expose to atmosphere to react with Oxygen (O2) and water (H2O) to form ion hydroxides (OH-). Ion Ferum (FE2+) will react with ion hydroxides (OH-) to form Ferum Oxide (Fe2O3) which typically a brown rust.
- Increases Acidity in Crevice Environment
The ions FE2+ formed potentially hydrolyze water (H2O) in tapped fluid and produced positive ion (i.e. H+) and FE (corrosion product). The corrosion product will further block the movement of trapped fluid and increase the corrosion potential. The H+ will further increase the acidity of the trapped fluid and this severely increases corrosivity of trapped fluid.
- Other Corrosion i.e. CSCC
Production of ion positive (H+) will also attract negative ions i.e Chlorides, Sulfates, etc outside crevice travel into the trapped fluid in crevice, accumulation of these negative ions will potentially results Chloride and Sulfate associated corrosion such Chloride stress corrosion cracking (CSCC).
Preventive measures
There are several preventive measures to minimize crevice corrosion.
i) Avoid / minimize crevices during design stage i.e. keep junction points as wide open as possible.
ii) Avoid / Minimise crevices during fabrication i.e. smooth weld
iii) Avoid / minimize solution get into crevice i.e. greasing bolt / nut
iv) Use high resistance material (high PRE material)
v) Avoid / Minimise crevices during operation. Scale settled on metal surface will form "crevice" and trapped fluid. Routine cleaning to remove scale is one of the effective way to minimise crevices.
vi) Avoid/ Minimize objects i.e plastic bag put on metal surface.
vii) External coating
Related Topics
Labels: Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking, Corrosion, Corrosion Resistance Material
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Recommended :
- Subscribe FREE - Processing Magazine
- Tips on Succession in FREE Subscription
Although Stainless steel is corrosion resistance to many corrosive fluids by formation of protective oxide film, it is still susceptible to pitting corrosion, one of the most destructive forms of corrosion which potentially cause equipment failures on perforation / penetration as discussed in "Pitting Corrosion - Mechanism & Prevention".Beside pitting corrosion, stainless steel also susceptible to Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking (CSCC) as discussed in "Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking & Use correct MOC for seawater service". CSCC is initiation and propagation of cracks in a metal or alloy under tensile stresses and a corrosive environment contains Chloride compounds. Once the crack is initiated, it will propagate rapidly and potentially lead to catastrophic failure. There are more discussion on stainless steel can be found here.
Click here to begin learning Stainless Steel and It Selection.
Following are complete listing of training module for Stainless Steel and It Selection.
01 - Disclaimer
02 - Module Abstract
03 - Module Information
04 - Chemical Symbols
05 - What Will We Cover?
06 - What Will We Cover? - What is Stainless Steel?
07 - How Stainless Steel Works
08 - Chromium is the Basic Building Block of Stainless Steels
09 - Damage to the Protective Oxide Film
10 - Penetration of the Protective Oxide Film
11 - Corrosion of Embedded Iron in a Stainless Steel Pipe Bend
12 - The protective passive film can be damaged mechanically or chemically in various ways.
13 - What Will We Cover? - Effect of Alloying Additions
14 - Effect of Alloying Additions
15 - 1. Corrosion Resistance
16 - Effect of Alloying Elements on Corrorsion Resistance - Chromium
17 - Effect of Chromium on Atmospheric Corrosion of Steels
18 - Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PRE)
19 - Effect of Alloying Elements on Corrosion Resistance - Nickel
20 - Addition of Nickel
21 - Nickel Provides Resistance to Reducing Chemicals
22 - Effect of Alloying Elements on Corrorsion Resistance - Molybdenum
23 - Effect of Alloying Elements on Corrorsion Resistance - Nitrogen
24 - Effect of Alloying Elements on Corrorsion Resistance - Carbon
25 - Hibernia Oil Production Platform
26 - 2. Crystal Structure
27 - Ferritic Stainless Steels
28 - Adding Nickel to Stainless Steels
29 - Austenitic Stainless Steel
30 - Duplex Stainless Steels
31 - List of Ferrite & Austenite Formers
32 - When Choosing a Stainless Steel
33 - What Will We Cover? - Families of Stainless Steels
34 - Families of Stainless Steels
35 - Ferritic Stainless Steels
36 - Typical Compositions of Common Stainless Steels
37 - Type 409 is hte most widely used ferritic stainless steel.
38 - Proprietary Grades
39 - Dishwashers
40 - Stainless Steel Refrigerators
41 - Hot Water Tank
42 - Austenitic Stainless Steels
43 - Typical Compositions of Common Stainless Steels
44 - Domestic Kitchen Sink
45 - Parliament House, Canberra, Australia
46 - Type 304 Stainless Steel Beer Kegs
47 - Chemical Plant
48 - Frederick R. Weisman Art Museum
49 - Wet Electrostatic Precipitator
50 - Duplex Stainless Steels
51 - Typical Compositions of Common Stainless Steels
52 - Type 316LN Stainless Steel - Example
53 - Pressurized Peroxide Reactor
54 - Stainless Steel Meat Racks
55 - Elevator Tower
56 - Families of Stainless Steels
57 - Martensitic Stainless Steels
58 - Typical Compositions of Common Stainless Steels
59 - Stainless Steel Products - Examples
60 - Martensitic Stainless Steel Blades
61 - Precipitation Hardening (PH) Stainless Steels
62 - Typical Compositions of Common Stainless Steels
63 - High Strength S45000 Precipitation Hardening Stainless Steel
64 - What Will We Cover? - Maximizing Corrosion Resistance
65 - Corrosion of Carbon Steel
66 - General Corrosion
67 - Localized Corrosion
68 - Pitting
69 - Once it gets started, pitting is difficult to stop and to repair.
70 - PRE Numbers for Some Ferritic, Austenitic & Duplex Grades
71 - Pitting Corrosion - Effect of Temperature and Chloride Level
72 - Crevice Corrosion
73 - Crevice Corrosion - Example
74 - Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC)
75 - Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking - Example
76 - Copson Curve
77 - Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking - Effect of Temperature and Chloride Level
78 - What Will We Cover? - High Performance Stainless Steels
79 - High Performance Stainless Steels
80 - Pitting and Crevice Corrosion Resistance
81 - Three Families of High Performance Stainless Steels
82 - PRE Numbers for Some Ferritic, Austenitic & Duplex Grades
83 - Immersed in Seawater Without Cathodic Protection
84 - Heat Exchanger
85 - Flexible Hosing
86 - Heat Exchanger for Aggressive Chloride Service
87 - Zeron 100 Fittings
88 - Condenser Tubes
89 - What Will We Cover? - Nickel Alloys
90 - More Resistant Alloys
91 - Nickel Alloys
92 - Alloy C-276
93 - Summary
Further Reading
- Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking & Use correct MOC for seawater service
- Pitting Corrosion - Mechanism & Prevention
- How Chloride stress corrosion cracking Lookslike ?
- Different Equation for Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN)
- Unified Numbering System for Metals and Alloys
Labels: Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking, Corrosion Resistance Material, Material
Monday, October 20, 2008
Subscribe FREE - Processing Magazine
H2S dissolved in water to form weak acid promote corrosion and form free hydrogen. Free Hydrogen will penetrate the metal, reduce ductility of metal and potentially lead to stress failure below it yield stress, results Sulphide Stress Corrosion Cracking (SSCC).NACE Standard MR0175 / ISO 15156 - Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries – Materials for use in H2S-containing Environments in Oil and Gas Production was established to provides limits of H2S partial pressure for precautions against sulfide stress cracking (SSC) and guidance for the selection and specification of SSC-resistant materials.
Since the released of this NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156, it has introduced a few more elements into the "sour" service criteria i.e. pH, Chloride contents, etc. This may have created some level of difficulties in understanding and usage of this standard.
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) has released a document entitle "GUIDE in Use of International Standard NACE MR0175/ISO15156" to provides a supporting document, which may be used as a reference tool to :
- provide a brief overview of the NACE / ISO publication, outlining the most significant changes and their implication to the industry,
- provide guidance and assistance on how to apply the new publication using simple to follow flowcharts, and clarification examples,
- provide sample forms which could be used to meet the intent of the publication.
For those engineer involved in Oil & Gas (upstream) exploration and production, this document is pretty good for understanding and reference.
Download.
Related Post
- What are the concerns related to H2S ?
- Safety Moment with H2S
- Pyrophoric Fire
- Correct model and thermo package in Amine system simulation using HYSYS
- Pitting Corrosion - Mechanism & Prevention
- Hydrogen present and it's impact to metallurgy
- Different Equation for Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN)
- Chlorride stress corrosion cracking and use of correct MOC for seawater
- How a Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking Lookslike ?
Labels: Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking, SSCC
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Recommended :
- Tips on Succession in FREE Subscription
- Subscribe FREE - OilField magazine
Use of artificial neural networks for predicting crude oil effect on CO2 corrosion of carbon steelsA Stochastic Prediction Model of Localized CO2 Corrosion
The effect of trace amount of H2S on CO2 corrosion investigated by using the EIS technique
Iron carbonate scale formation and CO2 corrosion in the presence of acetic acid
Use and Abuse of EIS in Studying the Mechanisms of CO2/H2S Corrosion of Mild Steel
Kinetics of Iron Sulfide and Mixed Iron Sulfide/Carbonate Scale Precipitation in CO2/H2S Corrosion
Experimental Study on Water Wetting and CO2 Corrosion in Oil-Water Two-Phase Flow
Recommended :
- Tips on Succession in FREE Subscription
- Subscribe FREE - Upstream magazine
CO2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel in High Ionic Strength Brine SolutionBasics Revisited - Kinetics of Iron Carbonate Scale Precipitation in CO2 Corrosion
Case Base Reasoning Model of CO2 Corrosion Based on Field Data
Investigation of the Localized CO2 corrosion Mechanism
Effect of Organic Acids on CO2 Corrosion
Related Post
- CO2 Corrosion in Oil & Gas - Part 1
- What are the concerns related to H2S ?
- Several Concerns in High CO2 Field Development
- How does Supercritical fluid looks like ?
- High Temperature Hydrogen Attack in metal & alloy
- Hydrogen Embrittlement TEST method
- Chlorride stress corrosion cracking and use of correct MOC for seawater
Labels: Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking, CO2, Corrosion
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Subscribe FREE - Utility Automation & Engineering T&D
Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S), Mercury (Hg), Nitrogen (N2), Chloride (Cl) in formation water, etc are components present together in the feedstock for Oil and Gas production, refinery and Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) production. Presence of CO2 and H2S with free water (H2O) can cause severe corrosion and Sulphide Stress Corrosion Cracking (SSCC) problems inCO2 with presence of free water would lead to generation of Carbonic acid (H2CO3).
When Carbonic Acid contact with steel (Fe), reaction occur.
Corrosion without Acid Carbonic :
and Corrosion with Acid Carbonic :
Carbonic acid is weak acid would reduce the pH of fluid and this further aggregate the corrosion.
Integrated CO2 Corrosion - Multiphase Flow Model
An integrated CO2 corrosion – multiphase flow model was built which takes into account the effect of most important variables. The model is mechanistic in nature and resides on clear theoretical foundations. All the assumptions in the model are explicitly stated and are open to future adjustments and improvements. The overall model was extensively verified with a large experimental database and was able to perform reasonably well in all cases. The multiphase flow model was also benchmarked against a well-established commercial package.
CO2 Corrosion Mechanistic Modeling and Prediction in Horizontal Slug Flow
This paper presents a CO2 corrosion mechanistic model specifically developed for the horizontal multiphase slug flow. It covers electrochemical reactions at the steel surface, transport of reactive species between the metal surface and the bulk, and the chemistry in the bulk solution. The special mass transfer correlations in slug flow were applied in this model. The model can predict the corrosion rate in horizontal slug flow. Comparison with laboratory experimental corrosion results revealed that it could help the understanding of the internal corrosion of horizontal pipeline under slug flow condition. Furthermore, this model shows that the Froude number and the slug frequency are two important factors influencing the internal corrosion rates under multiphase slug flow. This provides an insight for the pipeline design and production under multiphase slug flow.
The Effect of CI- and Acetic Acid on Localized CO2 Corrosion in Wet Gas Flow
Wet gas corrosion rates of C1018 and X65 steel have been measured at the top and bottom of a
high pressure, 10 cm diameter horizontal pipeline under stratified flow conditions with different chloride (Cl-) concentrations. Experiments were performed for 200 hours at 90°C, CO2 partial pressure of 3.8 bar using a superficial gas velocity (Vsg) of 10 m/s and a superficial liquid velocity (Vsl) of 0.1 m/s. Three measurement techniques; ER, LPR, and WL were used simultaneously in the experiments. Localized corrosion occurred at the bottom of the pipe around the iron saturation point. The top of line was well protected by a thin corrosion product film and no localized corrosion was detected. C1018 and X65 have different sensitivities to pitting with a variation in Cl- concentration. Thus the pitting density concept is proposed to describe localized corrosion behavior. Surface analysis on iron carbonate films, by SEM and XRD, revealed different film thicknesses and crystal structures from the top to the bottom of the pipe. Cross-sectional analysis indicates that the thin corrosion product film, usually less than 10 microns, attached to the metal surface, is responsible for the low corrosion rate on top of the line, while the thick and porous film formed on the bottom, generally detached from the metal surface, was responsible for the initiation of localized corrosion.
Subscribes to FREE Hydrocarbon Processing
This paper deals with the phenomena of corrosion by acetic acid and carbon dioxide at the top of a horizontal pipeline under dewing conditions. The effect of different parameters known to influence the Top of the Line Corrosion (TLC), such as the condensation rate and the bulk temperature is studied. The free acetic acid concentration varies from 0 to 1000 ppm, the bulk temperature, is set mainly at 70oC, the condensation rate is varied while the partial pressure of carbon dioxide and the gas velocity are set at a fixed value. The presence of acetic acid increases the corrosion rate both at the top and at the bottom of the line in different ways. The condensation rate influences strongly the top of the line corrosion when it has a small influence at the bottom. Evidences of localized corrosion are found at the bottom of the line. The corrosion at the top is uniform in the experiments conducted.
CO2 Corrosion in the Presence of Trace Amounts of H2S
Experiments were conducted to determine the effect of an incremental change in the solution pH, from 4 to 6.6, on CO2 corrosion rates of AISI 1018 steel in the presence of H2S in both single phase flow (Vsl = 1 m/s) and multiphase flow (Vsg=3 m/s, Vsl= 1 m/s) in a large scale multiphase flow loop. Linear polarization probes, electrical resistance probes, and weight loss coupons were used to monitor corrosion rates during 4 to 10 day exposures to a CO2 saturated solution with trace amounts of H2S. The media for experimentation was a 1% NaCl solution at 60ºC, at 7.9 bar (100 psig) total pressure, with gas phase additions of H2S up to 100 ppm. Protective adherent films, seen under these conditions, limited corrosion rates in both single phase and multiphase flow conditions.
Iron carbonate scale growth and the effect of inhibition in CO2 corrosion of mild steel
Investigations were conducted to investigate iron carbonate scale precipitation, the interaction between a corrosion inhibition and the precipitating iron carbonate scale, and their effects on the corrosion rate. Both the effects of iron carbonate precipitation on inhibited and uninhibited surfaces and the effects of inhibition on surfaces with iron carbonate scale were studied. The experiments were done in glass cells at 80 °C and a iron carbonate supersaturation range of 7 – 150. A generic imidazoline based inhibitor was added at various points in the iron carbonate scale formation process. Both corrosion rates and precipitation rates were measured using electrochemical and weight gain/loss methods. The scale was later analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). It was found that the dissolved ferrous ion concentration method, used previously, overestimates the rate of iron carbonate precipitation. Although no antagonism was found under any of other conditions tested, it was seen that the addition of the inhibitor retarded the growth of the iron carbonate scale.
Effect of acetic acid, pH and MEG on the CO2 top of the line corrosion
This research work presents a study of Top of the Line Corrosion (TLC) on carbon steels in the
presence of carbon dioxide and acetic acid. The influence of different parameters such as the presence of mono-ethylene glycol (MEG) and the use of pH control were studied in a 4” diameter flow loop. Two sets of experiments were conducted; one at 70ºC, high CO2 partial pressure and a “critical” condensation rate and another one at 80ºC, low CO2 partial pressure and a high condensation rate. Weight loss techniques and surface analysis were used to evaluate the corrosion rate and products. It was found that the presence of HAc at the concentrations evaluated does not affect the general corrosion rate at the top of the line. Top of the line corrosion rates correlate with the De Waard / Lotz estimate of 10% of bottom of the line rates15. It is believed that the corrosion mechanism is still controlled by CO2 partial pressure at the experimental conditions evaluated in this study. The presence of MEG has not shown any effect on TLC due to the fact that the condensation rate was kept constant. The use of pH control in the supply is believed to limit the amount of HAc in the condensed water. No clear evidence of localized corrosion or pits can be reported at this stage of the study due to the short time of exposure.
CO2/H2S corrosion under scale forming conditions
Three different mild steel coupons with two different surface areas were exposed to a CO2 saturated multiphase environment with a trace amount of hydrogen sulfide under supersaturated scale forming conditions designed to increase the probability of localized corrosion. Corrosion testing was conducted in the region of low supersaturation values for iron carbonate (SSFeCO3 < 10) and three different supersaturation values for iron sulfide (2.5 < SSFeS < 125) through adjustment of the partial pressure of H2S during 30 day exposures to system conditions. Experiments were conducted in a 1% NaCl solution at 60ºC, pH 6.0, 0.77MPa partial pressure CO2 with trace amounts of H2S in both single phase flow (Vsl = 1 m/s) and multiphase flow (Vsg=3 m/s, Vsl= 1 m/s). Under the conditions tested, both siderite and mackinawite films were developed as adherent corrosion product films. Localized corrosion was observed.
Click CO2 Corrosion in Oil & Gas - Part 2 to continue...
Related Post
- What are the concerns related to H2S ?
- Several Concerns in High CO2 Field Development
- How does Supercritical fluid looks like ?
- High Temperature Hydrogen Attack in metal & alloy
- Hydrogen Embrittlement TEST method
- Chlorride stress corrosion cracking and use of correct MOC for seawater
- Pitting Corrosion - Mechanism & Prevention
- How a Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking Lookslike ?
Labels: Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking, CO2, Corrosion
